Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4501 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-860 - 116 vs 98 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 40% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - $35.09 vs $58.49
- Up to 29% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G6900 - $0.4 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €64.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8160 minutes ago
Buy for €38.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |