Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1653 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-7820X - 259 vs 257 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $36.56 vs $323.94
- Up to 89% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-7820X - $0.16 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 346 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
257
99.22779922779922%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
11.428571428571429%
Price, €
€359.57
11%
Buy for €359.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |