Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-5820K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2682 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-5820K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 4% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-5820K - 222 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-5820K - $36.56 vs $314.37
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for €348.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-5820K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 140 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |