Buy on Amazon
€40.58
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3613 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3820 - 153 vs 146 FPS
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $36.56 vs $110.41
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-3820 - $0.27 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G6900 Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) UHD Graphics 710 Alder Lake (OEM Tray Version) 46W - Reliable Performance for Home and Office
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
146
95.42483660130719%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
32.142857142857146%
Price, €
€122.56
33%
CM8061901049606 Core i7 i7-3820 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA-2011
Buy for €122.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Single-Core
617
38.49033063006862%
Multi-Core
2299
85.27448071216617%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.