Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $29.24 vs $231.58
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 38% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G6900 - 541 vs 391 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75531 minutes ago
Buy for €257.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75531 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
60.24051108605787%
Multi-Core
2696
17.421647819063004%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |