Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3971 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2120.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 142% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-2120 - 58 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-2120 - $36.56 vs $73.11
- Up to 79% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-2120 - $0.7 vs $3.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
24
41.37931034482759%
Value, €/FPS
€3.38/FPS
20.710059171597635%
Price, €
€81.15
50%
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
501
31.25389893948846%
Multi-Core
1035
38.39020771513353%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-2120 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |