Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1189 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 798 vs 761 FPS
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $29.24 vs $506.05
- Up to 95% better value when playing Valorant than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.04 vs $0.74 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
798
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |