Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 425 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $54.68 vs $262.5
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.44 vs $2.05 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G6900 - 142 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
137
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Buy for €291.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |