Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 546 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $54.68 vs $259.58
- Up to 79% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.3 vs $1.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Buy for €288.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |