Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 912 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $29.24 vs $274.2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G6900 - 161 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €32.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66069 minutes ago
Buy for €304.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
94.68399291199054%
Multi-Core
2696
27.128194807808413%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |