Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3770 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $14.32 vs $344.69
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 35% better in Remnant II than Celeron G550 - 105 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 32 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76745 minutes ago
Buy for €382.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76746 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
12.949882273797511%
Multi-Core
629
3.129197552360579%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |