Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3504 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $14.32 vs $265.41
- Up to 94% better value when playing Control than Core i9-12900F - $0.08 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than Celeron G550 - 206 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 24 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Buy for €294.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |