Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $35.83 vs $169.64
- Up to 66% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i9-11900KF - $0.36 vs $1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 63% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G550 - 179 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
110
61%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15278 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
34%
Price, €
€188.3
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |