Buy on Amazon
€39.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $35.83 vs $153.55
- Up to 69% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - $0.27 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 30% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G550 - 194 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
149
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14597 minutes ago
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
30%
Price, €
€170.44
23%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.