Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $14.32 vs $190.07
- Up to 91% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-11900 - $0.2 vs $2.2 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 23% better in Remnant II than Celeron G550 - 96 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
78
81.25%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.2/FPS
9.090909090909092%
Price, €
€210.98
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
18.07511737089202%
Multi-Core
629
7.1347549909255905%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |