Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2696 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $14.32 vs $413.13
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Celeron G550 - 203 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 20 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76900 minutes ago
Buy for €458.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76901 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
24.428934010152282%
Multi-Core
629
6.712197204140432%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |