Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2978 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $35.83 vs $204.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-10850K - $0.25 vs $1.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G550 - 175 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 20 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
162
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
19%
Price, €
€226.44
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |