Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $35.83 vs $165.23
- Up to 73% better value when playing New World than Core i7-10700F - $0.41 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 23% better in New World than Celeron G550 - 119 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16152 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
26%
Price, €
€183.41
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €183.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |