Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $35.83 vs $71.3
- Up to 36% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-10400F - $0.07 vs $0.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Minecraft than Celeron G550 - 710 vs 594 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
594
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
710
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
63%
Price, €
€79.14
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |