Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2958 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $14.32 vs $237.63
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 57% better in War Thunder than Celeron G550 - 199 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 24 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77204 minutes ago
Buy for €263.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77205 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
22.267206477732792%
Multi-Core
629
6.271186440677965%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |