Buy on Amazon
€15.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4238 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - $14.32 vs $140.33
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G550 - 127 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Celeron G550 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.6 GHz 2M 65W LGA 1155
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76177 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for €155.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
19.979242345614946%
Multi-Core
629
6.126424466738093%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.