Key Differences
In short — Celeron G550 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G550 is 1004 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Phenom II X4 830 - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €15.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Celeron | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |