Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1458 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $14.07 vs $73.05
- Up to 81% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i7-6700T - $0.05 vs $0.26 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G540 - 307 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
296
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for €81.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |