Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4041 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $14.07 vs $182.78
- Up to 88% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13600KF - $0.09 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 53% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G540 - 264 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 20 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
173
65%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
11%
Price, €
€202.89
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |