Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $14.07 vs $71.78
- Up to 78% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105F - $0.13 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G540 - 132 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
117
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Buy for €79.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |