Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 456 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 61% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - $14.07 vs $35.83
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G540 - 154 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 55 vs 65 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for €39.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |