Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2419 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $14.07 vs $153.55
- Up to 90% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.06 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Celeron G540 - 272 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
250
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |