Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700X is 2006 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700X - $14.07 vs $142.59
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Celeron G540 - 196 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76884 minutes ago
Buy for €158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76886 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
36.39705882352941%
Multi-Core
679
12.181557229996413%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |