Buy on Amazon
€55.21
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1401 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G3258 - 463 vs 462 FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 27% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $36.1 vs $49.74
- Up to 25% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - $0.09 vs $0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4113 minutes ago
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
462
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.07
100%
Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for €40.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.