Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 280 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - $49.74 vs $215.7
- Up to 76% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-9900KF - $0.31 vs $1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G4900 - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
178
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15788 minutes ago
Buy for €239.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15789 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |