Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 281 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $49.74 vs $301.86
- Up to 83% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-7900X - $0.34 vs $1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G4900 - 172 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
164
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.95/FPS
17%
Price, €
€335.06
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €335.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |