Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $49.74 vs $388.24
- Up to 81% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-14900KF - $0.5 vs $2.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 50% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G4900 - 167 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
111
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14600 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.58/FPS
19%
Price, €
€430.95
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14599 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |