Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $49.74 vs $169.64
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 6000% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G4900 - 61 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 94% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G4900 - $3.09 vs $55.21 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18452 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.3
29%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18452 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |