Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $21.41 vs $204.87
- Up to 87% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-11900 - $0.13 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 31% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G4900 - 235 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€23.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €23.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
13%
Price, €
€227.41
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €227.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |