Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 846 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $17.05 vs $204.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-10850K - $0.03 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than Celeron G4900 - 734 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
680
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for €226.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |