Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 280 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - $17.05 vs $149.89
- Up to 68% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i7-9700KF - $0.27 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 188% better in League of Legends than Celeron G4900 - 199 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
69
34%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €18.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
32%
Price, €
€166.38
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €166.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |