Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $39.15 vs $108.01
- Up to 61% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-7700K - $0.23 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Celeron G4900 - 203 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
191
94.08866995073892%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
38.983050847457626%
Price, €
€119.89
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €119.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
39.2106938255888%
Multi-Core
1051
20.587659157688538%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |