Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6950X is 672 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $49.74 vs $328.3
- Up to 82% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-6950X - $0.12 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 18% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - 545 vs 463 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
463
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
545
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
17%
Price, €
€364.41
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €364.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |