Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1007 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $39.15 vs $95.05
- Up to 54% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-6700 - $0.27 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 13% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G4900 - 179 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
88.8268156424581%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
45.76271186440678%
Price, €
€105.51
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
47.641144624903326%
Multi-Core
1051
25.38647342995169%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |