Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 2241 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-3820 - $39.15 vs $255.83
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G4900 - 261 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76185 minutes ago
Buy for €283.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76185 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
99.83792544570503%
Multi-Core
1051
45.715528490648104%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |