Buy on Amazon
€43.46
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 2641 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Performs up to 0% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 323 vs 322 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $32.89 vs $39.15
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Intel BX80623I72600 Core i7-2600 Quad-Core Processor 3.4 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155
Buy for €36.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i7-2600
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.