Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2641 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - $49.74 vs $133.3
- Up to 62% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-2600 - $0.11 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
509
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
Buy for €147.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |