Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $49.74 vs $509.62
- Up to 87% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-13700K - $0.26 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 33% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G4900 - 279 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
210
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17040 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
12%
Price, €
€565.68
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for €565.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |