Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700 is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-11700 - $49.74 vs $161.21
- Up to 64% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-11700 - $0.32 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700
- Performs up to 18% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 202 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7240 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
35%
Price, €
€178.94
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €178.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |