Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 199 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - $49.74 vs $106.02
- Up to 43% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-9600K - $0.31 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 21% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Celeron G4900 - 216 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
179
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17053 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
57%
Price, €
€117.68
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |