Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 281 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $49.74 vs $114.06
- Up to 49% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-7640X - $0.26 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 54 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 18% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G4900 - 250 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
212
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
250
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
50%
Price, €
€126.61
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €126.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 112 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |