Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7400T is 455 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - $49.74 vs $54.84
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - 158 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - $0.39 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.87
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |