Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500K is 2641 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $39.15 vs $197.41
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - 466 vs 463 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75661 minutes ago
Buy for €219.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75661 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
95.3560371517028%
Multi-Core
1051
54.711087975013015%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |