Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $39.15 vs $90.37
- Up to 51% better value when playing New World than Core i5-10400 - $0.43 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 15% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 115 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6052 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
49%
Price, €
€100.31
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6054 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |