Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 945 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $49.74 vs $67.67
- Up to 26% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i3-6300 - $0.39 vs $0.53 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G4900 - 143 vs 140 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
140
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Buy for €75.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |