Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-560 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2774 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-560 - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 54 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $43.86 vs $49.74
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - $0.29 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
167
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€48.69
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €48.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |